John Dewey and his Plan To Put Children As The Center of Education

Is hard to believe that what we now consider as a “regular” educational system is far from what it was common before the 1900’s. Among those who helped carve the path for or current school system was John Dewey: a man whose point of view on education, differed greatly from that of the rest of his fellow citizens.

In a society where discipline, strict curriculum, enforced course studies and no feedback from students was the rule, Dewey was able to see beyond what society considered acceptable and provide an improved methodology for education. Despite the fact that he was a philosopher not an educator, Dewey gave great importance to the way schools were being run and thought that a reform was needed in order for them to fulfill their true purpose: encourage students to learn and understand at the same time. Before Dewey, all schools imposed their curriculum, teachers were the leaders and only their opinion mattered, students were to be in complete silence and obey to every order without refuting and learning consisted of memorization and repetition never comprehension.

To John Dewey, ideas and learning were tools that people could use to change or improve their circumstances. Dewey considered schools to be the link between the child and the man and thought they should play the role of facilitator of discovery and provider of experiences to which children hold on to find their true interests. Dewey was against the uniformity of students because to him it takes away the chance for them to develop as different people each one from the other; in addition, he argued textbooks were only current and objective as man would wanted them to be and left little room for individual perspectives. Continue reading

Engaging Troubling Students: A Constructivist Approach

In the book Engaging Troubling Students: A constructivist approach (2005), the authors Danforth and Smith give us an honest and insightful perspective about students with emotional or behavioral disorders and their interactions with the school system. The main purpose of the book was to encourage educators, communities and school personnel to analyze children’s behavior and the different events in their life that may be correlated to their conduct and performance in school.

The authors intended to be open and clear about their ideas and opinions on students that present challenging behavior in the school setting; moreover, they wanted to demonstrate that objective research may not be enough to comprehend students’ attitude because it lacks the affective factor and personal input that it could only be obtained through communication and interaction.

The authors use a critical constructivist approach, which is a combination of critical theory and constructivism, and that seeks to share ideas and opinions on how troubled students are educated in American schools. Since critical theory analyzes the social and economic injustices in society, it serves the purpose of providing an objective and analyzable perspective on students’ way of living and how this affects their behavior and performance; whereas, constructivism adds the individual factor to the approach by focusing on the students intellectual and emotional experiences which are undoubtedly brought into the classroom setting.

Both sides provide the authors with the opportunity to use socio-economic data and school policies, as well as examples of communication and interaction between students and educators, which could be helpful when looking for resources that would provide solutions to improve relationships among EBD children and the school system. Continue reading

Analyzing the Effects of FCAT Explorer Usage on FCAT Results

Society changes with time and circumstances; nevertheless, some things always remain a priority as well as a necessity. Education is among the steady factors influencing peoples’ environments and conditions; however, there are newcomers such as technology who have become just as important as those traditional values. Advancements made in the technological field have given people different possibilities and opportunities to learn and communicate which have eventually change the way educational tools are used.

As a result of the No Child Left behind Act, states and schools have become obliged to follow students’ progress, as well as to measure their learning gains and performance, in comparison to those of other students. Education is no longer about individual results nor is only important to teachers, it has turn into an issue of great deal to government agencies, businesses, researches, and law makers which puts pressure on academic achievement and literacy levels. Each state has to evaluate their students according to a set of standards that indicate what has to be learnt and accomplished, the standards also have to be taught within the curriculum and represent the grade level.

In Florida, the test given to all students and that it evaluates their academic achievement of the Sunshine State Standards, is the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test or FCAT. The importance the FCAT has in schools not only refers to the educational reason behind this test but also the financial consequences its results may have over a school or district; in addition, in certain grade levels the promotion or retention of a student happens according to the grade received on the test. Florida has used computer and web based programs such as FCAT Explorer, TeenBiz and Reading Plus to provide additional support to students for the FCAT; also, through this tool students are able to practice and improve their skills in reading, mathematics, science and other subjects.

In a study made by Trey Martindale, Carolyn Pearson, L.K Curda and Janet Pilcher, the effects of FCAT Explorer usage in grades fourth, fifth, eight and tenth were evaluated and analyzed for both reading and mathematics FCAT scores. The purpose was to examine if there was any significant difference among the results achieved by students who used the program and those who did not, as well as to observe the impact technology has over high stake standardized tests in public elementary and high schools.

The schools that participated in the study shared same characteristics like being part of same district, school size and performance grade assigned by state; they were also selected according to the usage or non-usage of FACT Explorer and basing on their scores on the FCAT in 2001 and 2002 for reading and mathematics. In the experiment, only students who showed or did not show data for FCAT Explorer in both 2001 and 2002 were included; in addition, the study included fourth grade reading and fifth, eight and tenth grade mathematics.

The research showed that students in the Elementary schools who used FCAT Explorer had significantly higher scores than those who did not use the program, especially for Fourth grade Reading and Fifth grade mathematics; however, the eight and tenth grade results showed no significant difference among those students who used and those who did not use FCAT Explorer. These findings conclude that there is an impact on FCAT Explorer usage in the Elementary level but no significant weight on Secondary grades. However, many would agree that the research does not include the instructional time given to FCAT Explorer use, as well as the quantity time assigned for each task or practiced items, which can have an influence on the results obtained by Elementary grade students.

Differences among results obtained in secondary and elementary levels could be due to different reasons. Availability of computers in the classrooms, ratio of student to computer and students’ individual level could be some of the causes for results; another explanation could be the diversity among students including those with disabilities, LEP or minorities and the importance a particular teacher places on the use of the program, which can be a huge influence in academic outcomes. Students’ value of FCAT Explorer could be different in both Elementary and Secondary levels, in addition to the diverse level of parental involvement there could be in each grade.

Many would agree that computer or web based programs and educational software could be a great support for students to practice their skills and abilities, in addition to the fact that technology seems appealing and interesting to children, and is becoming more everyday as part of society. Programs like FCAT Explorer offer another perspective and different way of acquiring knowledge and improving understanding of certain topics, and since is align with the benchmarks from the Sunshine State Standards and classroom curriculum, is not only useful for practicing FCAT but everyday material and strategies. Furthermore, web programs allow communication from administrators, parents and students to be easier; moreover, various learning styles could be accommodated and that way students could be reached from other perspectives, also it gives space for feedback, practice, pacing, space for research and individualization.

Some of the conclusions drawn from this study are: FCAT Explorer usage as an educational tool may considerably benefit students and give them opportunity to practice and improve their learning skills; it also provides room for teachers to use their material in a different way and target FCAT strategies outside of the classroom instructional time; it has showed to be more used by Elementary schools nevertheless it does not mean that it could be less useful for Secondary grades; it gives ample chances for various learning styles to be supported and students with disabilities find other ways to practice their abilities. However, difficulty accessing computers, low socioeconomic status, lack of school resources, little parental involvement and students disabilities may make more difficult the students to enjoy this opportunity to develop their capabilities.

LINK

A Reflection on Racism and Student Stereotypes

In our current American society there is a strong diversity of language, ethnicities, backgrounds, and even skin color. It is my belief that we have tried our best to learn how to be accepting of our differences. However, it has been a long and hard struggle to accomplish many of the things society now considers “rights”. As our environment has changed, with technology and multiculturalism, our values have also gone through a process of desegregation toward a more general spectrum of involvement.

As I read an article named: “Toward a Critical Race Theory in Teacher Education”, I found myself reflecting upon the many issues American people have experienced and how few have managed to use education not only as a way to improve society but also as the key to maintain a dominant ideology. Critical Race Theory strives to develop and promote a curriculum and attitude that eliminates racism and empowers minority groups, which are often underrepresented and over stereotyped. As I read the article, I found myself analyzing the information presented and agreeing with the many points given on how many teachers and scholars use their position to segregate and misestimate students from minority groups. Continue reading